Monday, February 4, 2013

The Feeling of Being Useless

It’s been quite a while since I have blogged in my Social Entrepreneur’s blog. I have been more busy with my NEEV Forum for Integral Living blog. But then I never planned to orphan this one for long.

Well, actually God does not want me to orphan it. While the NEEV Forum for Integral Living is the path of knowledge, Social Entrepreneurship is the path of action. It is taking some time for me to integrate both these paths in my self and in NEEV but then that’s his (God’s) wish, so things happen with an uncanny sense of timing.

As more and more intelligent and committed youth have started joining the movement of Social Entrepreneurship, I have been slowly thinking in terms of forming a NEEV Forum for Social Entrepreneurship. It’s an exciting idea for me personally and I am sure it would be for friends of NEEV who have seen NEEV move from an infant to an adolescent.

I had never wanted to scale NEEV as an organization. I wanted NEEV to be a role model, a seed crystal around which other movements, ideas and actions would crystallize. I have a great belief in swarm theory and I hope to blog on it some day. It is not systems but individuals acting in the system that are the real agents of change. I believe in the power of the individual.

As ordained by God, NEEV has slowly been attracting a steady current of intelligent and interested youth who want to do their bit in contributing to society. I have had a growing feeling in the past couple of months that now it is time for NEEV to transform from being a container of Social Entrepreneurship idea to a generator of Social Entrepreneurship and Social Entrepreneurship Movement. I have not done a great deal of thinking in this issue because, as a believer in swarm theory I believe in the swarm intelligence. A raw form of the idea has to be placed in front of the swarm and the swarm will respond with it’s intelligence. So I am placing this nascent idea in front of all of you with a request to share your intelligence with me and give this idea a life, a form and a swarm intelligence.

BW is a bright young girl recently having graduated from FMS (Faculty of Management Studies). After her MBA she joined a top rated corporate in India and was dispatched to a village for getting a peep into Rural India. BW came to know NEEV through Saurav, an alumni of REC Kurukshetra and a great friend of mine and NEEV. You all may recognize BW as the writer of one of the blogs I had posted in NEEV Forum for Integral Living. I spotted a talent in her for writing and urged her to blog on social issues. This is her second blog which I am introducing to NEEV with a sense of great pride. She, of course vindicates my faith in her talent and also brings home a point with her characteristic sense of self deprecating honesty. This is a hard to find honesty.

She has voiced my own thoughts in her blog. This is what I have been trying to tell people since a decade. Social Entrepreneurship is not about Power Point Presentations, Pie-Charts and slick graphics. Borrowing a word from my tradition, Vedanta, it is a long “sadhana” (discipline). The word Social Entrepreneurship has become trendy and I am happy it has but the story has just begun. In one of the lectures I was giving on Social Entrepreneurship at a school, I was asked by a girl, “Sir, what degree do we need to pursue to become a Social Entrepreneur?” I was a bit flummoxed by the question because in my whole life I had never thought of doing a degree to become a Social Entrepreneur. It all flowed from within and got built through the realities I experienced. That’s the beauty of Social Entrepreneurship – it requires passion, perseverance and honesty. These are skills that cannot be taught in courses. These do not flow from the cold analytics of the mind but from the heart. I am not discounting the mind. In fact, if anything, Social Entrepreneurship will stretch every resource of your mind and even more. It is mind plus.

As BW has so nicely documented, the realities you have to deal with in Social Entrepreneurship are multi layered and complex. In a sense they mimic the dazzling complexity and variety of Life. Again borrowing a term from Vedanta, you have to grapple with Maya, and she is an exceedingly bewitching opponent. The moment you think you have figured her out, she transfigures. I love Social Entrepreneurship because I get to play the toughest contender – Maya. Social Entrepreneurship was the Karma Yoga for me, in the field of action.

Ultimately the Kurukshetra (battle-field) is within. The feeling of being useless, which BW mentions is beginning of a journey. The world’s greatest wisdom of Bhagvad Gita was not given to Arjuna when we was all strong and confident. He was a warrior, par excellence. But despite his excellence, he was assailed by the feeling of uselessness of war. It was this moment of honesty and humility in Arjuna that Krishna seized to give the eternal wisdom of life. Please read BW’s blog at

http://bovinewings.blogspot.in/2013/02/the-feeling-of-being-useless.html

Thursday, June 7, 2012

Of Public Virtue and Private Hypocrisy

The blog could have been adorned with a better name had I titled it "Of Public Virtue and Private Vice" but that would have been absolutely true of a creed of men called politicians. For businessmen, a more haloed lot, and the subject of my blog, this title would unfortunately not be wholly true. It robs me from the perverse pleasure I would have got in exacting my vengeance from them, but I shall wait. And lest I be alleged for plagiarizing, I hasten to add that the title for this blog entry is not mine but wholeheartedly borrowed from an article by Sidkin Vadukut titled "Dear Mr. Speaker" that appeared in livemint.com

This blog follows close in heels to my previous blog entry, The Morality Patch. I could feel the blood tingling in my veins as I read this article from Sidkin. Finally, someone is writing about something that is so close to my own personal experience. 

Sidkin writes with a dean pan humor and scathing sarcasm. Humor and sarcasm make heady stuff easier for people to swallow. (Till the government started banning cartoons from textbooks). I, on the other hand, usually adopt a more sedate tone, because I want my pill to be bitter, and I want my surgeon's knife to go deeper to heal our wounds. This perhaps, may make me less endearing to my readers but that's something I can forgo for when rank self-interest masquerades as morality, virtues and acceptable public discourse, the wounds are deeper. Perhaps this is the reason why after all these years I have come to bestow a fair degree of respect to naked self interest because when it masks itself in virtue, it not only confuses morally upright souls, but leaves behind an agonizing wound of betrayal. 

The corporates have had a long history of co-opting, "The True, The Good and The Beautiful" for self-serving ends. This has been briefly encapsulated in one of my previous entries "On Capitalism and Social Work". At risk, therefore, are not just the gullible youth who provide ready fodder for this greed machine. No, at stake here is the real meaning and purpose of life, the liberty of man to find truth. At risk here, if I may say so, is the direction of societies and humanity. So the least that I can do is to expose the sham, to break down the magnificent facade of pretensions erected by the corporates. After all, I went through the same process of deconstructing the corporate halo as I read book after book and later got whip-lashed by the corporate world for daring to talk about virtues, values and relationships. 


To veer away a few souls from the neon lit, glittering roads of illusion to a dark and silent path illumined with the true and natural beauty of moonlight, that would be fruit enough for my toils. But for now let's just remove some sheen from the glittering neon lights. Remember, the age old adage : all that glitters is not gold.


Dear Mr. Speaker

by Sidkin Vadukut


Dear esteemed graduation speech-givers,

This is the graduating class of 2012. This year all of you have stunned us with graduation speeches of exceptional quality all over India. Many of us have been touched by your inspirational words.

Usually people like you are so busy, and getting time for a frank tete-a-tete is hugely challenging.

Therefore, we relish this rare chance to give you feedback. Hello! Please keep your BlackBerry on the table, your iPad in your bag, sit up and listen boss. Focus. Come on!

Thanks.

First of all, information technology pioneer, we would like to speak to you. Every two to three months you go around giving speeches at colleges about India and young people and the future and all that. Sometimes you give speeches abroad also. You tell us to think beyond our textbook education, beyond exams and marks, and develop as complete individuals with wholesome personalities. Only then, you said, can we rise to our true potential as individuals and as a nation.

But two weeks ago, during final placements the HR manager in your company was asking only for marksheets and exam transcripts. Some of us with very wholesome personalities did not even get short-listed because way back in class XII we went through a rebel “gangster rap” phase and got only 68% marks. Boss, if your company itself refuses to hire us, then how can we rise to our true potential as individuals?

We are disappointed.

Next, we would like to have a brief chat with you, chief executive of the major family-owned business conglomerate that has over 100 years of history. Often, we have heard you tell students that the future of India is in our hands. That if we put our minds to it we can achieve anything. That we are as good as anybody else in the world. And that all we had to do was break through the shackles that society and traditional family values put on us.

Very good indeed. Very inspiring. But then why is the post of chief executive in your group of companies hereditary? Your grandfather appointed your father. He appointed you. And now your son is preparing for future leadership positions in assorted nightclubs in Monte Carlo. What about the rest of the people in your company? How will they break the shackles of your family values?

We are disappointed.

Excuse me, where are you trying to crawl off to, you manufacturing and engineering tycoon? You are next. Please come back. You have always been the most patriotic of this lot. For you, everything is about India, India, India. A full 25% of your commencement speech is inspirational quotes from Mahatma Gandhi, Jawaharlal Nehru and other freedom fighters. And for you the most important quality you seek in a young person is sacrifice for the nation. Don’t go abroad, you say in your speeches. Stay in India. Help the nation. Forego economic gain, and strive for social justice.

Fine. We will make sacrifices within our limits. But boss, why do you keep moving your factories and investment projects from state to state based on tax cuts and incentive packages? You can also sacrifice a little bit tax for the benefit of the local region, no? Think of all the people in deprived areas whose lives you can change with your business muscle and sustained presence. Pity you are being so petty.

We are disappointed.

Namaste namaste bureaucrat-ji! Tea? Coffee? OK. Your speech about the future of India we enjoyed very much indeed. And the verses you recited from Tamil Sangam literature was very apt for the occasion. You are perhaps correct. Widespread entrepreneurship could well be the only way to create large-scale economic activity. And young entrepreneurs could possibly create the millions of jobs we need each year to employ our ‘youth dividend’. Good points. Well made.

But you forgot to mention one very important point sir. How many copies of our proposal in triplicate does your ministry need along with how much “urgency arrangement surcharge” in order to get the name of our company approved? If you tell us quickly then we can arrange for funds quickly and start our business. We were hoping you would make all this clear during the graduation speech along with the rate card. But you did not.

We are disappointed.

And finally, we have you, director of the institute. Your opening remarks on the role of business education in the future of India’s growth was illuminating and inspiring. However, why not start implementing this education right here? We have always found it amusing to go to the canteen after a lecture on cutting-edge production management techniques, only to stand in line for 20 minutes because the chappati maker is not working properly.

This is most disappointing.

But otherwise overall the class of 2012 has been truly inspired by the speeches all of you have made. We step forth into the real world fully aware of the power of public virtue and private hypocrisy.

Please wish us well.



Wednesday, May 30, 2012

The Morality Patch

I like the title of this blog. I wish I would have coined it entirely but I must admit that  I have fashioned it out from an article, "The Service Patch" by David Brooks an Open Editorial columnist of New York Times. It, so perfectly defines the new age morality. People have found a patch for morality, something which I have witnessed with silent pain and angst, as I approach my middle age.

When we started Social Entrepreneurship (we didn't use this term back then) we started it as a genuine response from the heart. At that time there were awards and recognitions for people doing good work in this field but there were no competitions, the "big boys" and "celeb whiz kids". The discourse was predominantly that of idealism, ecology and spirituality. Slowly, we saw the space being vandalized by the same dynamics we see in the corporate world. People with power and money muscled us out. Social enterprises started talking in terms of turnovers and scalable numbers rather than the language of the spirit and the heart. It was tough to see all this coming initially. But then, the outlines of this hostile takeover of a noble field became too stark for me to ignore. Subsequent years have seen me receding to a silent corner. I shy away from most events, seminars and competitions of Social Entrepreneurship because this whole field, as David Brooks points out, has become subsumed by a utilitarian vocabulary. We have lost the true vocabulary of what makes character.

Nonetheless, I have not ceased in my own endeavour and I am sure there are others like me who wage their life's struggles in the penumbra of  social recognition. I still feel, we have been extremely fortunate to receive the social recognition we achieved so far. I don't deny being torn apart between the need to make myself known in circles where it matters and the imperative to remain true to one's soul. Yet, so far, I have I have resisted the devil's temptation to take a short cut to "heroism" and make "morality patches". "We shall take the long walk", I keep telling this to myself.

Social Entrepreneurship, the way I see it is never about numbers. It is a far deeper and more profound vision of human kind. At present we are seeing it in a crass and trivial form. In another blog article I shall attempt to articulate what I see as the true movement of social entrepreneurship.
I reproduce below an excerpt from the article by David Brooks that appeared in the online edition of New York Times

Community service has become a patch for morality. Many people today have not been given vocabularies to talk about what virtue is, what character consists of, and in which way excellence lies, so they just talk about community service, figuring that if you are doing the sort of work that Bono celebrates then you must be a good person.

Let’s put it differently. Many people today find it easy to use the vocabulary of entrepreneurialism, whether they are in business or social entrepreneurs. This is a utilitarian vocabulary. How can I serve the greatest number? How can I most productively apply my talents to the problems of the world? It’s about resource allocation.

People are less good at using the vocabulary of moral evaluation, which is less about what sort of career path you choose than what sort of person you are.

In whatever field you go into, you will face greed, frustration and failure. You may find your life challenged by depression, alcoholism, infidelity, your own stupidity and self-indulgence. So how should you structure your soul to prepare for this? Simply working at Amnesty International instead of McKinsey is not necessarily going to help you with these primal character tests.

Furthermore, how do you achieve excellence? Around what ultimate purpose should your life revolve? Are you capable of heroic self-sacrifice or is life just a series of achievement hoops? These, too, are not analytic questions about what to do. They require literary distinctions and moral evaluations.

When I read the Stanford discussion thread, I saw young people with deep moral yearnings. But they tended to convert moral questions into resource allocation questions; questions about how to be into questions about what to do.

It’s worth noting that you can devote your life to community service and be a total schmuck. You can spend your life on Wall Street and be a hero. Understanding heroism and schmuckdom requires fewer Excel spreadsheets, more Dostoyevsky and the Book of Job.


Monday, April 23, 2012

Breaking the Matrix: Making the Road by Walking


“When the Matrix was first built there was a man born inside that had the ability to change what he wanted, to remake the Matrix as he saw fit. It was this man that freed the first of us and taught us the truth; as long as the Matrix exists, the human race will never be free. When he died, the Oracle prophesied his return and envisioned that his coming would hail the destruction of the Matrix, an end to the war and freedom for our people. That is why there are those of us that have spent our entire lives searching the Matrix, looking for him.”

(Wachowski 1998, 43-44), The Matrix

As children we are all born free and joyous, without notions of money, class, religion, morality and ambition. No sooner, we are delivered to the Matrix, a system that weans us while at the same time imprisoning us for the rest of our lives. Yet there is something within the soul of every man that the matrix cannot imprison, that retains a nebulous memory of freedom. While most men never begin their journey for freedom, some try to break free by revolting outwardly, only to find themselves entrenched in it more firmly: But there have been a few who break the matrix.

1“The life that most of us lead in society is to conform, that is, to adjust our thinking, our feeling, our ways of life, to a pattern, to a particular sanction or mould of a civilized society, a society that is always moving slowly, evolving according to certain patterns. And we are trained from childhood to conform to the pattern, to adjust ourselves to the environment in which we live. And in this process there is never learning. We may revolt from conformity, but that revolt is never freedom.

All religions are part of society, invented by man for his own particular security psychologically. Religions as they are now organized have their dogmas, their rituals; they are ridden with authority and divisions. So religions too do not want man to be free.

So the problem is: is it possible for man to conform and yet be free from society? Man must conform, must adjust himself - he must keep to the proper side of the road for the safety of others when he is driving, he must buy a stamp to post a letter, he must pay taxes on his income, and so on. But conformity, for most of us, is much deeper; we conform psychologically, and that is where the mischief of society begins. And as long as man is not free of society, not free of the pattern that society has established for him to follow, and then he is merely moral - moral in that he is orderly in social sense - but he is disorderly in the virtuous sense. A man who follows the morality of a particular society is immoral, because that only establishes him more and more in a pattern and makes him more and more a slave to it. He becomes more and more respectable and therefore more and more mediocre.”1

Morpheus
“The Matrix is everywhere, it's all around us, here even in this room. You can see it out your window or on your television. You feel it when you go to work, or go to church or pay your taxes. It is the world that has been pulled over your eyes to blind you from the truth… you are a slave, Neo. Like everyone else, you were born into bondage, kept inside a prison that you cannot smell, taste, or touch. A prison for your mind.” (1998, 29)


We are living in a matrix created by the multinational corporations called Global Capitalism. This matrix of Global Capitalism is our mother, whose mammaries we suck. These corporations unleash  forces that not only shape our economic lives but also dictate what we think, feel, wear, eat, and what meaning we make out of our lives.

The matrix has 2“pitilessly torn asunder the motley ties that bound man to his “natural superiors”, and has left remaining no other nexus between man and man than naked self interests, than callous “cash payment”. It has drowned the mostly heavenly ecstacies of religious fervour, of chivalrous enthusiasm, of philistine sentimentalism, in the icy water of egoistic calculation. It has resolved personal worth into exchange value, and in place of the numberless indefeasible chartered freedoms, has set up that single, unconscionable freedom – Free Trade. In one word, for exploitation, veiled by religious and political illusions, it has substituted naked, shameless, direct, brutal exploitation.”2

The matrix has 3“stripped of its halo every occupation hitherto honoured and looked up to with reverent awe. It has converted the physician, the lawyer, the priest, the poet, the man of science, into its paid wage labourers. It has torn away from the family its sentimental veil, and has reduced the family relation to a mere money relation”3

The matrix has developed a 4“class of labourers, who live only so long as they find work, and who find work only so long as their labour increases capital. These labourers, who must sell themselves piecemeal, are a commodity, like every other article of commerce, and are consequently exposed to all the vicissitudes of competition, to all the fluctuations of the market. Owing to the extensive use of machinery, and to the division of labour, the work of human beings has lost individual character, and, consequently, all charm for the workman. He becomes an appendage of the machine, and it is only the most simple, most monotonous and the most easily acquired knack that is required of him.”4

The matrix is one gigantic machine, crunching individuals’ freedom, obliterating their small pockets of freedom until they get swamped in the competition created by the matrix. The specialized and creative skills of people are rendered worthless by newer forces of production while masses of labourers are crowded into the factory organized like soldiers like an industrial army.

5“Governments seem wholly incapable of responding, and public frustration is turning to rage. It is more than a failure of government bureaucracies, however. It is a crisis of governance born of convergence of ideological, political and technological forces behind a process of economic globalization that is shifting power away from the governments responsible for the public good” towards the matrix, “a handful of co-operations and financial institutions driven by a single imperative – the quest fro short term financial gain. This has concentrated massive economic and political power in the hands of an elite few whose absolute share of the products of a declining pool of natural wealth continues to increase at a substantial rate – thus reassuring them that the system is working perfectly well. 

The Matrix controlled by the world’s largest corporations constantly reassures us that consumerism is the path to happiness, governmental restraint of market excess is the cause of our distress, and economic globalization is both a historical inevitability and a boon to the human species. In fact, these are all myths propagated to justify profligate greed and and mask the extent to which the global transformation of human institutions is a consequence of the sophisticated, well funded, and intentional interventions of a small elite whose money enables them to live in a world of illusion apart from the rest of the humanity.”5

MORPHEUS
The Matrix is a system, Neo, and that system is our enemy. But when you are inside and you look around, what do you see; businessmen, lawyers, teachers, carpenters. The minds of the very people we are trying to save. But until we do, these people are still a part of the system and that makes them our enemy. You have to understand that most of these people are not ready to be unplugged and many of them are so inured, so hopelessly dependent on the system that they will fight to protect it.

No regime, regardless of how authoritarian it might be, could sustain itself primarily through organized state power and armed force. In the long run, it has to have popular support and legitimacy in order to maintain stability.
The matrix thus creates a cultural hegemony, an entire system of values, attitudes, beliefs and morality that has the effect of supporting the status quo in power relations. This hegemony is an organizing principle that is diffused by the process of socialization into every area of daily life. It in internalized into the consciousness by the population as “common sense”, so that the philosophy, the culture and the morality of the creators of the matrix appear as the natural order of things. 

The matrix prevails in the curriculum of our schools, our religious scriptures, political parties, cultural associations, clubs and the family: So much so that the matrix uses its coercive apparatuses, the forces of law and order, as a last resort. Instead its domination is maintained by the overwhelming consent of the mass of people.

Overcoming popular consensus created by the matrix is never going to be easy. Majority of the people has accepted what is happening in the society as “common sense” or as the “only way of running society”. There may be complaints about the way things are run and people look for improvements or reforms but the basic belief and value systems underpinning society are taken as granted.

MORPHEUS
The  Matrix is programmed to protect its software with the help of “agents”: Agents are ”sentient programs. They can move in and out of any software still hardwired to their system. That means that anyone that we haven't unplugged is potentially an Agent. Inside the Matrix, they are everyone and they are no one” (Wachowski 1998, 63).

On a day in 399 BC the philosopher Socrates stood before a jury of 500 of his fellow Athenians accused of "refusing to recognize the gods recognized by the state" and of "corrupting the youth."

Allegedly, Abraham Lincoln, who waged a war against slavery, was assassinated by the banking cartel. In his own words,

“The money powers prey upon the nation in times of peace and conspire against it in times of adversity. The banking powers are more despotic than a monarchy, more insolent than autocracy, more selfish than bureaucracy. They denounce as public enemies all who question their methods or throw light upon their crimes. I have two great enemies, the Southern Army in front of me and the bankers in the rear. Of the two, the one at my rear is my greatest foe. [As a most undesirable consequence of the war...] Corporations have been enthroned, and an era of corruption in high places will follow. The money power of the country will endeavor to prolong its reign by working upon the prejudices of the people until the wealth is aggregated in the hands of a few, and the Republic is destroyed." —Abraham Lincoln”

This is just to cite the violent deaths of two famous figures of history who challenged the matrix. The agents of the matrix are not men whom we instantly recognize as violent. More than often they are respectable and moral citizens, who 6“glide on water, cuts ribbons, walks across golf greens, greets mothers and babies and obliges TV anchors.  (He may be a man who) in his plush Oxford Street office has a photograph of him with a bunch of international buddies, global players and Sultans of the stock market. It is a black and white snapshot of the cartel that rules the world.”6

The matrix blurs the distinction between moral and immoral. A slave to the matrix is described as moral while Socrates is described as immoral and corrupting.

AGENT SMITH
I'd like to share a revelation that I've had during my time here. It came to me when I tried to classify your species. I've realized that you are not actually mammals. Every mammal on this planet instinctively develops a natural equilibrium with the surrounding environment. But you humans do
not. You move to an area and you multiply and multiply until every natural resource is consumed and the only way you can survive is to spread to another area.

There is another organism on this planet that follows the same pattern. Do you know what it is?

A virus.

He smiles.

Human beings are a disease, a cancer of this planet. You are a plague. And we are... the cure.

Being in the Matrix 7“we are experiencing accelerating social and environmental disintegration in nearly every country of the world. There is a rise in poverty, unemployment, inequality, violent crime, failing families, and environmental degradation. These problems stem in part from a fivefold increase in economic output since 1950 that has pushed human demands on the ecosystem beyond what the planet is capable of sustaining. The continued quest for economic growth as the organizing principle of public policy is accelerating the breakdown of the ecosystem’s regenerative capacities and the social fabric that sustains human community; at the same time, it is intensifying the competition for resources between rich and poor – a competition that the poor invariable lose.”7

8“In India, the 300 million of us who belong to the new, post-IMF “reforms” middle class—the market—live side by side with spirits of the nether world, the poltergeists of dead rivers, dry wells, bald mountains and denuded forests; the ghosts of 2,50,000 debt-ridden farmers who have killed themselves, and of the 800 million who have been impoverished and dispossessed to make way for us. And who survive on less than twenty rupees a day.”8

NEO (V.O.)
I believe deep down, we both want this world to change. I believe that the Matrix can remain our cage or it can become our chrysalis, that's what you helped me to understand. That to be free, you cannot change your cage. You have to change yourself.
I can't tell you how to get there, but I know if you can free your mind, you'll find the way.

Throughout history there have been people who have seen beyond the matrix. In every heart there is a flame that seeks out truth. Eventually, if this flame is not smothered by the education of the matrix, it begins it’s ascent to truth. And when it does, strange co-incidences start taking place. People with messages enter and exit your lives, books come by the way, phrases uttered by strangers are caught by your conscience and life, instead of turning like a cog, shatters the predetermined boundaries and starts drifting in a mysterious cosmic current.

The start of the journey is to understand the way we have been conditioned by the matrix. Or, even prior to that, understand that there is a matrix that is controlling our lives. It’s painful to realize that we are caught in the cage of the matrix. What we thought, felt and knew about our life was never our own but a set of social codes, moral injunctions and authority of the religious scriptures. But this cage is comfortable. The matrix rewards us if we follow and punishes us if we alter our course. One’s cage may be more beautiful than the other, nonetheless it is a cage. When we see the cage, the entire design of it, in that seeing, arises, the first ray of freedom.

The matrix is not outside. The matrix exists till we give it authority, sanction and validity in our minds. The social codes, religious injunctions and economic determinism of the corporates are all patterns to which we conform to, psychologically. Freedom begins when we revolt inwardly to all form of authority we have accepted in our minds.

As Noam Chomsky says, “I think it only makes sense to seek out and identify structures of authority, hierarchy, and domination in every aspect of life, and to challenge them; unless a justification for them can be given, they are illegitimate, and should be dismantled, to increase the scope of human freedom.”

Mere revolt to outer forms of society without understanding one’s own structures of power, ambition and violence has been the bane of many a social movements. One has to change oneself. Self transformation is a revolution because it unplugs you from the matrix and is the beginning of intelligence. From hereon there is no predetermined path. You make the way as you walk.

Stripped of our religious gods, our social gods, our economic gods, unplugged from the matrix: it may seem a frightening yet undeniably exhilarating experience. The burden of choice, perhaps for the first time, is squarely put on us. There is no authority to be blamed, no destination to be reached, no preset rules to live. We create the matrix.

MORPHEUS
She told you exactly what you needed to hear. That's all. Sooner or later, Neo, you're going to realize just like I did the difference between knowing a path and walking a path.

I guess there are many who know what is right or at least what is wrong, who are tortured by their slavery to the matrix. Yet, knowing is not enough for one has to walk the path. I have met some who think in a disillusioned way that they are out of the matrix just because they understand and can articulate it in its most pressing details.

There is a difference between knowing the path and walking it, just as there is a difference between knowing where Himalayas are and climbing its peak.  Walking the path is a lot of hard work. It is about the 9“willingness to look at problems honestly, to look at them without illusions, and to go to work chipping away at them, with no guarantee of success — in fact, with a need for a rather high tolerance for failure along the way, and plenty of disappointments.”9

No guarantee of success?!! Yes, the matrix has reared us on the carrot and the stick. It is almost the purpose of our life to be seen as successful by someone; the most highly prized middle class value that keeps intelligent minds plugged to the matrix. Again, as Noam Chomsky writes, “How people themselves perceive what they are doing is not a question that interests me. I mean, there are very few people who are going to look into the mirror and say, 'That person I see is a savage monster'; instead, they make up some construction that justifies what they do. If you ask the CEO of some major corporation what he does he will say, in all honesty, that he is slaving 20 hours a day to provide his customers with the best goods or services he can and creating the best possible working conditions for his employees. But then you take a look at what the corporation does, the effect of its legal structure, the vast inequalities in pay and conditions, and you see the reality is something far different.”


NEO (V.O.)
When I used to look out at this world, all I could see was its edges, its boundaries, its rules and controls, its leaders and laws. But now, I see another world. A different world where all things are possible. A world of hope. Of peace.

10“Optimism is a strategy for making a better future. Because unless you believe that the future can be better, it’s unlikely you will step up and take responsibility for making it so. If you assume that there’s no hope, you guarantee that there will be no hope. If you assume that there is an instinct for freedom, there are opportunities to change things, there’s a chance you may contribute to making a better world. The choice is yours.”10

11“It is within our means,( however), to reclaim the power that we have yielded to the institutions of money and re-create societies that nurture cultural and biological diversity – thus opening vast new opportunities for social, intellectual, and spiritual advancement beyond our present imagination. Millions of people the world over are already acting to reclaim this power and to rebuild their communities and heal the earth.
We are now on the threshold of an ecological era called into being by an Ecological Revolution grounded in a more holistic view of the spiritual and material aspects of our nature. This revolution now calls to each of us to reclaim our political power and rediscover our spirituality to create societies that nurture our ability and desire to embrace the joyful experience of living to its fullest.”11

References
  1.      Talks by J Krishnamurti, Madras, 23rd Dec, 1964
  2.      The Communist Manifesto: Marx and Engels, 1848
  3.      The Communist Manifesto: Marx and Engels, 1848
  4.      The Communist Manifesto: Marx and Engels, 1848
  5.      When Corporations Rule the World, David C. Korten, 1995
  6.      The Hindu : Opinion / Op-Ed : Go beyond the gore and get the message, Syeda Hameed,   April 7, 2012
  7.      When Corporations Rule the World, David C. Korten, 1995
  8.     Capitalism: A Ghost Story, Arundhati Roy, Outlook India, Mar 26, 2012
  9.     Noam Chomsky, http://www.goodreads.com/author/quotes/2476.Noam_Chomsky
  10.     Noam Chomsky, http://www.goodreads.com/author/quotes/2476.Noam_Chomsky
  11.     When Corporations Rule the World, David C. Korten, 1995

Thursday, March 29, 2012

On Capitalism and Social Work

Corporate philanthropy has turned to be the most visionary business of all time. 
Arundhati Roy, Capitalism: A Ghost Story, Outlook, 26th March 2012

It's heartening to see truth coming out in a mainstream publication like Outlook. It's all the more to extract truth when it comes cloaked in the garb of philanthropy.  Arundhati Roy, in the article referred exposes the workings of the matrix called "capitalism". It's difficult for anyone to be out of this matrix because no one knows it's there. I have met many well intentioned and religious people who have not yet decoded the DNA of capitalism.

Corporate-endowed foundations administer, trade and channelise their power and place their chessmen on the chessboard, through a system of elite clubs and think-tanks, whose members overlap and move in and out through the revolving doors. Contrary to the various conspiracy theories in circulation, particularly among left-wing groups, there is nothing secret, satanic, or Freemason-like about this arrangement. It is not very different from the way corporations use shell companies and offshore accounts to transfer and administer their money—except that the currency is power, not money.
 Arundhati Roy, Capitalism: A Ghost Story, Outlook, 26th March 2012



There are few amongst men who have not fallen for the intoxicating lure for power. One presumes that people working for upliftment of the world should not parry with name and power because this is the surest doorway for sullying intentions. Unfortunately, charity, an ennobled path for the men of high virtue has been morphed by coporates into a "career option", as promising as any other, where men in suits hob nob with the rich, the high and the mighty over banquets in five star hotels. 

Like all good Imperialists, the Philanthropoids set themselves the task of creating and training an international cadre that believed that Capitalism, and by extension the hegemony of the United States, was in their own self-interest. And who would therefore help to administer the Global Corporate Government in the ways native elites had always served colonialism. So began the foundations’ foray into education and the arts, which would become their third sphere of influence, after foreign and domestic economic policy. They spent (and continue to spend) millions of dollars on academic institutions and pedagogy. 
Arundhati Roy, Capitalism: A Ghost Story, Outlook, 26th March 2012


Antonio Gramsci, one of the foremost Marxist thinkers in the 20th century became renowned for his concept of cultural hegemony as a means of maintaining the state in a capitalist society. Corporate foundations today are the instruments for making free thinking men wedded to capitalistic ideology. Feudalism was in many ways better than capitalism as it controlled people physically. The enemy was out there, clear and visible. Capitalism is far more complex. It is coded in your thought process through the educational institutions. We parade around like free thinking men unbeknownst to us that we are bound to the mother culture of capitalism in the most hideous ways. It  provides us with the meaning and purpose of life. 

As the IMF enforced Structural Adjustment, and arm-twisted governments into cutting back on public spending on health, education, childcare, development, the NGOs moved in. The Privatisation of Everything has also meant the NGO-isation of Everything. As jobs and livelihoods disappeared, NGOs have become an important source of employment, even for those who see them for what they are. And they are certainly not all bad. Of the millions of NGOs, some do remarkable, radical work and it would be a travesty to tar all NGOs with the same brush. However, the corporate or Foundation-endowed NGOs are global finance’s way of buying into resistance movements, literally like shareholders buy shares in companies, and then try to control them from within. They sit like nodes on the central nervous system, the pathways along which global finance flows. They work like transmitters, receivers, shock absorbers, alert to every impulse, careful never to annoy the governments of their host countries. (The Ford Foundation requires the organisations it funds to sign a pledge to this effect.) Inadvertently (and sometimes advertently), they serve as listening posts, their reports and workshops and other missionary activity feeding data into an increasingly aggressive system of surveillance of increasingly hardening States. The more troubled an area, the greater the numbers of NGOs in it.
 Arundhati Roy, Capitalism: A Ghost Story, Outlook, 26th March 2012



And why to leave the NGOs out of this conspiracy. I remember reading a book, "The Brave New World", a chilling foresight into a society being increasingly fashioned according to capitalistic interests. Is all the technology aiding us to become free thinking citizen or is it just making us into bits of information being fed into a giant supercomputer controlling every single facet of our lives.

Armed with their billions, these NGOs have waded into the world, turning potential revolutionaries into salaried activists, funding artists, intellectuals and filmmakers, gently luring them away from radical confrontation, ushering them in the direction of multi-culturalism, gender, community development—the discourse couched in the language of identity politics and human rights.
Arundhati Roy, Capitalism: A Ghost Story, Outlook, 26th March 2012


There's scarcely a man who has not signed his truce with the devil of capitalism. Let's pray that there are some who shall have the wisdom and the courage to tell people a different story, whisper dreams of a different earth.